<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title> - 911truth.org</title>
    <link>http://www.911truth.org/</link>
    <description>The official 9/11 myth's emotional and political power will continue to drive the country in a dozen different destructive directions until we confront and deconstruct it with 9/11 truth.
</description>
    <copyright>Copyright  © 2012  - 911truth.org</copyright>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:37:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120127054514589">U.S. fights to keep $6.6 million in al-Qaeda assets from 9/11 victims</source>
      <title>U.S. fights to keep $6.6 million in al-Qaeda assets from 9/11 victims</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120127054514589</link>
      <description>January 22, 2012
  By Chris Mondics, Inquirer Staff Writer
Philadelphia Inquirer
In a ferocious legal battle pitting government lawyers against victims of the 
  Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the Justice Department is fighting to block 
  thousands of individuals and businesses from taking $6.6 million in frozen al-Qaeda 
  assets seized from an alleged terrorism financier.
Frozen by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2007, the money is sought by the 
  attorneys for 6,000 individual victims and insurers who suffered billions in 
  losses from the attacks on the World Trade Center.
The money, in a Chicago brokerage account controlled by senior al-Qaeda operative 
  Abu al-Tayyeb until his arrest in Saudi Arabia in 2006, drew little public notice 
  until lawyers for 9/11 victims moved in June to collect on a 2007 default judgment.
A short time later, the Justice Department initiated legal proceedings to claim 
  the money for itself - and keep it out of the hands of the 9/11 victims and 
  insurers.
That triggered a fierce response from the victims' lawyers, among them the 
  Center City law firm Cozen O'Connor, who accuse the Justice Department of duplicity 
  in seeking to prevent them from getting access to the money.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:43:32 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120127054514589</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120123145736124">CIA whistleblower charged for leaking torture secrets</source>
      <title>CIA whistleblower charged for leaking torture secrets</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120123145736124</link>
      <description>January 23, 2012
By Agence France-Presse
Monday, January 23, 2012
RawStory.com
A former CIA official who publicly confirmed the waterboarding of top Al-Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah was charged Monday with leaking classified information to journalists, including the identities of two CIA officers.

John Kiriakou, who served with the CIA between 1990 and 2004, was charged with violating a law that makes it illegal to disclose the identity of a covert officer, leaking classified information and lying to a CIA publications review board, the department said.

He faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted on all charges.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:53:25 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120123145736124</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120120134709791">Were Explosives the Source of the Seismic Signals Emitted from New York on September 11, 2001?</source>
      <title>Were Explosives the Source of the Seismic Signals Emitted from New York on September 11, 2001?</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120120134709791</link>
      <description> by Andr&amp;eacute; Rousseau
January 20, 2012
911truth.org
[Updated 1/21/12 to correct figures 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b and 2c, originally uploaded without study author's notations.]
INTRODUCTION
When major shocks occur at the Earth's surface or at depth, waves of 
  different types, magnitudes and speeds may move out from the source location. 
  Such waves can be detected by seismometers located at recording stations, and 
  the data from the recordings can be analyzed to learn many details of the source 
  events. Seismic signals were recorded at stations in New York and four neighboring 
  states on September 11, 2001 during the period when the North and South Towers 
  (WTC1 and WTC2, respectively) were struck by airliners and collapsed, as well 
  as during the collapse of Building 7 of the WTC, which had not been hit by a 
  plane.
Data from the Palisades, NY recording station, located 34 km north-north-east 
  of Manhattan, published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia 
  University (LDEO), provide the most detailed seismic waveforms for analysis, 
  particularly for the determination of the locations (aerial, surface, or subsurface) 
  and timing of the events that created the seismic waves. 
Seismologists have been puzzled in their analysis of signals recorded for the 
  events at the World Trade Center, as the contradictions are significant. They 
  are particularly intrigued by the presence of seismic &quot;peaks&quot; before 
  the collapses. This text focuses on the study of the seismic signals from Palisades. 
  The new interpretation presented here renders the assertions of the seismic 
  analysis of the events at the WTC, presented by the government, null and void.
</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:43:50 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120120134709791</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120120063743893">New Project Censored Book Makes Media Revolution</source>
      <title>New Project Censored Book Makes Media Revolution</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120120063743893</link>
      <description> January 20, 2011
by Dr. Paul Rea
911Truth.org
Huff, Mickey and Project Censored, Eds. Censored 2012: The Top Censored 
  Stories and Media Analysis of 2012. New York: Seven Stories Press, September 
  2011. $19.95.
Even more than its predecessors, Censored 2012 makes for highly engaging and 
  informative reading. This collection is a well mixed bag containing much that 
  we need to know but too often don't. 
This deficit occurs because many Americans are, in Neil Postman's memorable 
  phrase, &quot;amusing ourselves to death&quot; and in part because many exhibit 
  an aversion to discussing issues. But above all the deficit results from increased 
  media malpractice and censorship. When a study shows that regular viewers of 
  Fox News are less informed--and likely more misinformed--than those 
  who don't follow the news, something is seriously amiss. 
According to editor Mickey Huff, the corporate media are serving up a diet 
  of &quot;junk-food news to avoid telling the public what is really going on 
  at home and abroad&quot; (p. 12). If this strikes many readers as obvious, 
  fewer seem fully aware of just how pervasive this censorship has become--how 
  very little coverage many significant issues receive. </description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:35:13 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120120063743893</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120118054804845"></source>
      <title></title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120118054804845</link>
      <description>Imagine ...
Having to rely on government-sanctioned 
  media and publishers 
to &quot;allow&quot; you access to history or current events and government actions.
No 911truth.org ...
No Historycommons.org ...
No Wikipedia.org ...
No Secrecy News sharing CRS Reports, No CLG, No Information Clearinghouse, No access to information released because of FOIA efforts  ... No more of whatever sources you rely on to be in-the-know so that you can make informed decisions ...
Imagine a United States with No Human Being-managed information sources accessible
 online ... 

STOP SOPA &amp; 
  PIPA
Learn 
  moreTake 
  action TODAY
&quot;An informed citizenry is the only 
  true repository of the public will.&quot;&quot;What country can preserve its liberties 
  if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the 
  spirit of resistance?&quot; &quot;In matters of style, swim with the 
  current;
  In matters of principle, stand like a rock&quot; 
 Thomas Jefferson
</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 03:47:31 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120118054804845</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120115142224224">10 reasons the U.S. is no longer the land of the free</source>
      <title>10 reasons the U.S. is no longer the land of the free</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120115142224224</link>
      <description>By Jonathan Turley
January 13, 2011
Washington Post
Every year, the State Department issues reports 
  on individual rights in other countries, monitoring the passage of restrictive 
  laws and regulations around the world. Iran, for example, has been criticized 
  for denying fair public trials and limiting privacy, while Russia has been taken 
  to task for undermining due process. Other countries have been condemned for 
  the use of secret evidence and torture.
		Even as we pass judgment on countries we consider unfree, Americans remain confident that any definition of a free nation must include their own -- the land of free. Yet, the laws and practices of the land should shake that confidence. In the decade since Sept. 11, 2001, this country has comprehensively reduced civil liberties in the name of an expanded security state. The most recent example of this was the National Defense Authorization Act, signed Dec. 31, which allows for the indefinite detention of citizens. At what point does the reduction of individual rights in our country change how we define ourselves?While each new national security power Washington has embraced was controversial when enacted, they are often discussed in isolation. But they don't operate in isolation. They form a mosaic of powers under which our country could be considered, at least in part, authoritarian. Americans often proclaim our nation as a symbol of freedom to the world while dismissing nations such as Cuba and China as categorically unfree. Yet, objectively, we may be only half right. Those countries do lack basic individual rights such as due process, placing them outside any reasonable definition of &quot;free,&quot; but the United States now has much more in common with such regimes than anyone may like to admit.These countries also have constitutions that purport to guarantee freedoms and rights. But their governments have broad discretion in denying those rights and few real avenues for challenges by citizens -- precisely the problem with the new laws in this country.The list of powers acquired by the U.S. government since 9/11 puts us in rather troubling company.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:52:22 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120115142224224</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120111054512389">The Stakes Have Never Been Higher</source>
      <title>The Stakes Have Never Been Higher</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120111054512389</link>
      <description>January 11, 2012by James Hufferd, Ph.D., Coordinator, 9/11 
  Truth Grassroots Organization
 Most of the recent big, commonly noticeable and objectionable changes in our 
  controllable circumstances in America -- including many downright atrocities 
  -- have happened since September 11, 2001. And a goodly number of them 
  have developed as a direct consequence. Although that day still seems, 
  in many ways, very recent, it appears to have marked not only a beginning of 
  our current and accumulating woes, but also the end of a long age of relative 
  bliss, freedom, and a degree of personal opportunity that we haven't experienced 
  since. 
My supposition, which I've voiced here before, is that 9/11 wasn't 
  just an &quot;inside job&quot;, but rather was done at the bequest of an international 
  elite firmly in control of our (government + corporate) establishment, as well 
  as those in other countries, the main trunk of the giant controlling octopus 
  being international central banking. 
Within a year or two after 9/11/01, at least a small segment of the populace 
  was beginning to note that a credible (and routine) investigation of the background 
  and modus operandi of 9/11 still hadn't been conducted by the criminal 
  justice system. The lack of initiative in this case seemed puzzling due to nearly 
  all Americans' faith at the time in the strength and reliability of the constitutional 
  machinery of due process. The ensuing insistence by many that such routine procedures 
  be carried out and criminal accountability be exacted stemmed from a shocked 
  observation that such was not already completed, as one would have supposed, 
  nor even yet underway. And thus, the 9/11 Truth movement in its present form 
  was conceived to compel or urge that tardy process. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:44:14 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120111054512389</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120104064253814">Justifying War with Iran</source>
      <title>Justifying War with Iran</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120104064253814</link>
      <description>By Russ Baker
  December 26, 2011
  WhoWhatWhy.com
A growing body of evidence points to a concerted campaign to prepare Americans 
  and the world for war against Iran. This is not idle speculation. It fits a 
  pattern that repeatedly preceded previous hostilities.
Here are the recent examples on Iran:
-The claim that Iran is a WMD threat. Pretty much everyone is familiar with 
  the long-term, continuing efforts to paint Iran as some kind of nuclear threat. 
  This ignores the possibility that Iran is telling the truth in contending it 
  is embarked on solely non-military nuclear research (debatable), and serious 
  doubts among many experts that Iran is preparing nuclear weapons. Perhaps most 
  important, it discounts the fact that many countries (including Iran's 
  arch-enemy Israel) have nuclear weapons, and disregards the undoubted truth 
  that if a country like Iran ever did launch nuclear weapons, it would be wiped 
  out in a nanosecond, creating a very strong disincentive for offensive use. 
  At the same time, by encouraging other countries and internal foes to believe 
  that it has nuclear weapons, Iran creates an inexpensive protective shield for 
  its regime. A dangerous game, to be sure, but without further evidence of Iranian 
  nukes, hardly a reason to launch a war that would surely cause even more death 
  and destruction than the misguided Iraq invasion. [Continues...]
Also below: &quot;Crackpot Anti-Islam Activists, 'Serial Fabricators' and the 
  Tale of Iran and 9/11&quot; from Truth-Out.org.
And from the archives, &quot;Iran Gave U.S. Help On Al Qaeda After 9/11&quot; (CBS News).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:37:30 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20120104064253814</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20111230053423304">Appeals Court Revives EFF's Challenge to Government's Massive Spying Program</source>
      <title>Appeals Court Revives EFF's Challenge to Government's Massive Spying Program</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20111230053423304</link>
      <description>Justices Find that Spied-On Telephone Customers Have the Right to 
  Sue 
December 29, 2011
  Electronic 
  Frontier Foundation, EFF.org 
San Francisco - The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today blocked the government's 
  attempt to bury the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF's) lawsuit against 
  the government's illegal mass surveillance program, returning Jewel v. NSA to 
  the District Court for the next step.
The court found that Jewel had alleged sufficient specifics about the warrantless 
  wiretapping program to proceed. Justices rejected the government's argument 
  that the allegations about the well-known spying program and the evidence of 
  the Folsom Street facility in San Francisco were too speculative.
&quot;Since the dragnet spying program first came to light, we have been fighting 
  for the chance to have a court determine whether it is legal,&quot; said EFF 
  Legal Director Cindy Cohn. &quot;Today, the Ninth Circuit has given us that 
  chance, and we look forward to proving the program is an unconstitutional and 
  illegal violation of the rights of millions of ordinary Americans.&quot;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 03:33:35 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20111230053423304</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <source url="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20111130053249325">Senate Approves Requiring Military Custody [of US Citizens in US] in Terror Cases</source>
      <title>Senate Approves Requiring Military Custody [of US Citizens in US] in Terror Cases</title>
      <link>http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20111130053249325</link>
      <description>By Charlie Savage
November 29, 2011 
New York Times

WASHINGTON -- Defying the Obama administration's threat of a veto, the Senate on Tuesday voted to increase the role of the military in imprisoning suspected members of Al Qaeda and its allies -- including people arrested inside the United States.

By a vote of 61 to 37, the Senate turned back an effort to strip a major military bill of a set of disputed provisions affecting the handling of terrorism cases. While the legislation still has several steps to go, the vote makes it likely that Congress will eventually send to President Obama's desk a bill that contains detainee-related provisions his national-security team has said are unacceptable.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:51:45 EST</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20111130053249325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
