VIEW Recent Articles
Browse by Category
Graphic image for 9/11 foreknowledge
Graphic: unanswered questions
Graphic of paper shredder- destruction of evidence
Graphic: conflict of interest
Cui bono graphic
Alleged Hijacker graphic
9/11 Commission Shield

Suddenly, Impeachment Hearings are Starting to Look Likely

CleanPrintBtn gray smallPdfBtn gray smallEmailBtn gray small

11/08/2007

You wouldn’t know it if you just watch TV news or read the corporate press,
but this past Tuesday, something remarkable happened. Despite the pig-headed
opposition of the Democratic Party’s top congressional leadership, a majority
of the House, including three Republicans, voted to send Dennis Kucinich’s long
sidelined Cheney impeachment bill (H Res 333) to the Judiciary Committee for
hearings.

The vote was 218 to 194.

Now the behind-the-scenes partisan maneuvering that preceded that vote was
arcane indeed, with Kucinich first exercising a member’s privilege motion to
present his stymied impeachment bill to the full House, only to have Speaker
Nancy Pelosi arrange for a colleague (Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-MD) to
offer a motion to table it. The Republicans, anxious to embarrass the Speaker,
threw a wrench into that plan, though, by voting as a bloc to oppose tabling.
Since Kucinich already has 22 co-sponsors for his bill, it was clear that the
tabling gambit would fail. As soon as that became apparent, rank-and-file Democrats,
unwilling to be seen by their constituents as defending Cheney, rushed to change
their votes to opposing the tabling motion. In the end, tabling failed by 242
to 170 with 77 Democrats supporting a pleasantly surprised Kucinich.

To avoid a floor debate on the merits of impeaching the eminently impeachable
Vice President Cheney, Pelosi and her allies then moved to send Kucinich’s bill
directly to the Judiciary Committee. They were joined by three Republicans,
including maverick Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-TX).

Now the hope of the Democratic leadership is that this means Kucinich’s impeachment
bill will continue to be safely bottled up in a subcommittee of the Judiciary
Committee. But it may not work out that way for them.

Whatever the explanation, this impeachment bill has been endorsed by a floor
vote of the full House, with bipartisan support.

For the Judiciary Committee to sit on it now and not schedule a hearing would
be a gross travesty of parliamentary procedure and custom.

Indeed, some House members not associated with Kucinich’s resolution are now
openly calling for immediate hearings into Cheney’s impeachable actions — specifically
lying the country into a war in Iraq and threatening war with Iran.

One indication of the change in the political climate in the House is the announcement
by Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), a six-term congressman and a member of the House
Judiciary Committee, that he will call for the Judiciary Committee to take up
Kucinich’s impeachment bill. This is significant because Wexler, no left-wing
hothead, is not a co-signer of the Kucinich bill.

In an e-mail message to constituents, Wexler said: “I share your belief
that Vice President Cheney must answer for his deceptive actions in office,
particularly with regard to the preparations for the Iraq war and the revelation
of the identity of covert agent Valerie Plame Wilson as part of political retribution
against her husband.”

“…Cheney and the Bush Administration have demonstrated a consistent
pattern of abusing the law and misleading Congress and the American people.
We see the consequences of these actions abroad in Iraq and at home through
the violations of our civil liberties. The American people are served well with
a legitimate and thorough impeachment inquiry. I will urge the Judiciary Committee
to schedule impeachment hearings immediately and not let this issue languish
as it has over the last six months. Only through hearings can we begin to correct
the abuses of Dick Cheney and the Bush Administration; and if it is determined
in these hearings that Vice President Cheney has committed High Crimes and Misdemeanors,
he should be impeached and removed from office. It is time for Congress to expose
the multitude of misdeeds of the Administration and I am hopeful that the Judiciary
Committee will expeditiously begin an investigation of this matter.”

Also calling for prompt action by the Judiciary Committee in the wake of the
Tuesday House vote was Carol Shea-Porter, a first-term Democrat from New Hampshire,
who also is not a sponsor of the Kucinich measure. In explaining her vote to
send the Kucinich bill to the Judiciary Committee, she said:

“It is the duty of the Vice President to faithfully execute the laws of
the United States of America and to defend the Constitution. There is growing
evidence that the Executive Branch has ignored some of our laws and has attempted
to bend the Constitution to its will. Members of both parties decided that this
issue is too important to ignore. I voted with my Republican and Democratic
colleagues to investigate the Vice President’s actions in office.”

She characterized the resolution sending the bill to the Judiciary Committee
a “strongly bipartisan vote.”

With these kinds of endorsements and calls for action, it is clear that Speaker
Pelosi is looking increasingly pathetic and out of touch with her “impeachment
is off the table” mantra, and also that Judiciary Chair John Conyers (D-MI),
who seems to have been intimidated by the Speaker for the past year, but who
earlier had been a leader in exposing the crimes of the Bush/Cheney Administration,
is getting strong support for taking a bolder stand.

Stephen Cohen (D-TN), a member of the Judiciary Committee who is a co-sponsor
of the Kucinich resolution, says he thinks that there will be an impeachment
hearing in the committee.

The 22 House members who have already signed on as co-sponsors of Kucinich’s
Cheney impeachment resolution are: Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Maxine Waters (D-CA),
Hank Johnson (D-GA), Keith Ellison (D-MN), Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), Barbara Lee
(D-CA), Albert Wynn (D-MD), William Lacy Clay (D-MO), Yvette Clarke (D-NY),
Jim McDermott (D-WA), Jim Moran (D-VA), Bob Filner (D-CA), Sam Farr (D-CA),
Robert Brady (D-PA), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Donald Payne (D-NJ), Steve Cohen
(D-TN), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-MI), Ed Towns (D-NY),
Diane Watson (D-CA), and Danny Davis (D-IL).

The change in attitude toward impeachment among the rank and file, and the
evident increasing willingness to buck the Speaker, reflects growing awareness
of the groundswell of popular anger with the Bush Administration and the Democratic
Congress over continued funding of the Iraq War, and over continued erosion
of Constitutional government and civil liberties by an administration that wants
unfettered executive power and by a Congress that is afraid to act.

The latest polls show three in four Democrats in favor of impeaching the vice
president and president, while a majority of all Americans favor impeaching
the vice president and roughly half of all Americans favor impeaching the president.

This is before hearings and presentation of evidence have even begun!

The Democratic strategy for the 2008 election has been to do nothing overly
confrontational, to pass no significant legislation, to collect lots of money
from corporate interests, and to hope the Republican Party, saddled with an
unpopular administration and an unpopular war, will implode.

The strategy, however, is proving to be a disaster, as public support for the
Democratic do-nothing Congress has fallen even below the president’s record
low numbers. Just running against Republicans, Bush/Cheney, and the continuing
war risks seeing Democrats go down to defeat in ’08.

It is awareness of this looming electoral disaster that underlies the growing
restiveness among rank-and-file Democrats in the House, all of whom have to
face the voters in less than a year’s time.

As recently as a month ago, it didn’t look like impeachment was in the cards;
Now it’s starting to look like Cheney’s going to be put in the dock.

It may not be long before we start to see bills of impeachment filed against
President Bush too.

The corporate media enjoy making fun of Rep. Kucinich, a height-challenged
but dedicated progressive who has made a career of standing tall for his views.
If his bill ends up leading to impeachment hearings against Cheney, Kucinich
will end up having the last laugh.

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based investigative journalist and columnist.
His latest book, co-authored by Barbara Olshansky, is
“The Case for
Impeachment” (St. Martin’s Press, 2006 and now available in paperback).
His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.

Source URL: http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/node/3674/print