Browse by Category
Graphic image for 9/11 foreknowledge
Graphic: unanswered questions
Graphic of paper shredder- destruction of evidence
Graphic: conflict of interest
Cui bono graphic
Alleged Hijacker graphic
9/11 Commission Shield

Shocking and Awe-ful–Government Secrecy (or, How can this guy still be in office?!)

CleanPrintBtn gray smallPdfBtn gray smallEmailBtn gray small

Cheney Defiant on Classified Material
Executive Order Ignored Since 2003

Cheney won't complyBy
Peter
Baker

Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, June 22, 2007; A01

Vice President Cheney’s office has refused to comply with an executive order
governing the handling of classified information for the past four years and
recently tried to abolish the office that sought to enforce those rules, according
to documents released by a congressional committee yesterday.

Since 2003, the vice president’s staff has not cooperated with an office at
the National Archives and Records Administration charged with making sure the
executive branch protects classified information. Cheney aides have not filed
reports on their possession of classified data and at one point blocked an inspection
of their office. After the Archives office pressed the matter, the documents
say, Cheney’s staff this year proposed eliminating it.

The dispute centers on a relatively obscure process but underscores a wider
struggle waged in the past 6 1/2 years over Cheney’s penchant for secrecy. Since
becoming vice president, he has fought attempts to peer into the inner workings
of his office, shielding an array of information such as the industry executives
who advised his energy task force, details about his privately funded travel
and Secret Service logs showing who visits his official residence.

The aggressive efforts to protect the operations of his staff have usually
pitted Cheney against lawmakers, interest groups or media organizations, sometimes
going all the way to the Supreme Court. But the fight about classified information
regulation indicates that the vice president has resisted oversight even by
other parts of the Bush administration. Cheney’s office argued that it is exempt
from the rules in this case because it is not strictly an executive agency.

“He’s saying he’s above the law,” said Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.),
chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which released
a series of correspondence yesterday outlining the situation. “It just
seems to me this is arrogant and shows bad judgment.”

Cheney’s office declined to discuss what it called internal matters. “We
are confident that we are conducting the office properly under the law,”
said spokeswoman Megan McGinn.

The Justice Department confirmed yesterday that it is looking into the issue.
“This matter is currently under review in the department,” said spokesman
Erik Ablin, who declined to elaborate.

The standoff stems from an executive order establishing a uniform, government-wide
system for safeguarding classified information. The order was first signed by
President Bill Clinton in 1995 and was updated and reissued by President Bush
in 2003. Under the order, an “entity within the executive branch that comes
into the possession of classified information” must report annually how
much it is keeping secret.

Cheney’s office filed annual reports in 2001 and 2002 describing its classification
activities but stopped filing in 2003, according to internal administration
letters released yesterday. Cheney’s office made the case that it is not covered
because the vice president under the Constitution also serves as president of
the Senate and therefore has both legislative and executive duties.

In 2004, the Archives’ Information Security Oversight Office, a 25-member agency
responsible for securing classified information, decided to conduct an on-site
inspection of Cheney’s office to see how sensitive material was handled. The
vice president’s staff, according to a letter Waxman sent Cheney, blocked the
inspection.

After the Chicago Tribune reported last year that Cheney failed to report classification
data, the Federation of American Scientists filed a complaint. J. William Leonard,
director of the Archives’ oversight office, sent two letters to Cheney’s chief
of staff, David S. Addington, requesting compliance with the executive order
but received no replies. Leonard then wrote Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales
in January asking him to render a legal ruling on whether the vice president
is violating the order. Gonzales has not replied.

In an interview yesterday, Steven Aftergood, who directs the federation’s Project
on Governmental Secrecy, said the dispute concerns “a very narrow bit of
information” but indicated a broader disregard for following the same rules
as the rest of the executive branch. “By refusing to comply with these
trivial instructions, the vice president undermines the integrity of the executive
order,” he said. “If it can be violated with impunity on a trivial
point, then it can also be violated on more important matters.”

Leonard, in his letters to Addington and Gonzales, argued that the interpretation
that the Office of the Vice President is not an executive entity “could
impede access to classified information by OVP staff, in that such access would
be considered a disclosure outside the executive branch.”

But Leonard may have angered Cheney’s office with his persistence. The administration
is conducting a review of the executive order, and Leonard told Waxman’s staff
that Cheney aides proposed amending the order to abolish the Archives oversight
office and explicitly exempt the vice president from its requirements. The elimination
of the office has been rejected, Waxman said.

Leonard did not return phone messages yesterday. Susan Cooper, a spokeswoman
for the National Archives, said: “In carrying out the responsibilities
of the National Archives Information Security Oversight Office, we will continue
to be responsive to the concerns of all governmental parties.” Cheney’s
press office refused to comment on the changes proposed to the executive order.

Source URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/21/AR2007062102309.html?hpid=topnews