VIEW Recent Articles
Browse by Category
Graphic image for 9/11 foreknowledge
Graphic: unanswered questions
Graphic of paper shredder- destruction of evidence
Graphic: conflict of interest
Cui bono graphic
Alleged Hijacker graphic
9/11 Commission Shield

One Database to Rule Them All

CleanPrintBtn gray smallPdfBtn gray smallEmailBtn gray small

Homeland Security, the “Keystone Stasi,” Now Tracks and Enforces Local Police Warrants

June 20, 2006: For many years, those working to create a total surveillance state have employed the “salami tactic” of taking away our freedoms one slice at a time. Laws that directly challenge constitutional rights, like the USA PATRIOT Act, are the spectacular exception. Agencies like FEMA quietly prepare plans for martial law, and have built a “Shadow Government” for military rule without need of a written order. The Bush administration for its part has constantly tested the waters, establishing new realities by fiat (as in its creation of the “enemy combatant” category to justify unlimited detention without charges), or floating test balloons like the “Total Information Awareness” program (which was withdrawn officially, even as the NSA’s telephone surveillance proceeded to implement its spirit behind the scenes).

Now we must all realize that at some point, the salami runs out. It no longer makes sense to say that our government is creating a police state. The fact is, that state has arrived, complete with One Big Database and the establishment of universal jurisdictions. In an editorial published this week in New York Newsday, Ray LeMoine tells a memorable story of how he was detained by Homeland Security for several hours because of outstanding local police warrants relating to his sale of unlicensed T-shirts (“Yankees Suck,” among others). We dare not dismiss this as a minor matter; it shows that there is nothing about us in electronic form that Homeland Security does not know. Though he is clearly a believer in the official story of 9/11, LeMoine doesn’t let his humorous tone hide the true meaning of his story: Homeland Security, the “agency set up to combat terrorism after 9/11 has been given universal jurisdiction and can hold anyone on Earth for crimes unrelated to national security… erasing the lines of jurisdiction between local police and the federal state.” If we do not fight back, the day when Homeland Security can detain people for being behind on their credit card payments is not far off. A national ID card with a chip of our complete financial, health and criminal records seems almost superfluous. Once again, 9/11 was a useful pretext for those who exploit terror to wage war on freedom. (nl)


The following editorial was published by New York Newsday (newsday.com) on June 19, 2006 (see original).

So who are they saving us from?

Homeland Security is on the job protecting us from the likes of illegal T-shirt vendors and traffic scofflaws

BY RAY LeMOINE

June 19, 2006

Arriving at JFK from Dubai recently, I was stopped at Customs by an officer from the Department of Homeland Security and directed to a drab backroom filled with Arabs, South Asians and Africans. I wasn’t surprised, really, having just spent six months working and traveling in the Islamic world – Turkey, Lebanon, Egypt and Pakistan. If ever there were a DHS red-flag candidate, I was it, and I assumed this was just protocol.

Four of those months were in Pakistan, and I had just spent a week with a journalist friend going to different madrasas, including one Islamic school visited by one of the bombers in the July 2005 attacks in London. Possibly I caught their attention by poking around the Karachi Marriot’s parking lot, across from the U.S. consulate, where a suicide bomber’s attack had killed a U.S. diplomat just two months before.

How about the hundreds of phone calls I made from Pakistan to friends and family back home that inevitably mentioned the Taliban’s resurgence and criticized President George W. Bush. Was I wiretapped? Certainly Homeland Security, whose stated mission is to “lead the unified national effort to secure America . . . prevent and deter terrorist attacks and protect against and respond to threats and hazards to the nation,” had detained me for such a reason.

Or maybe officers had questions about the Jamaat-ud-Dawa rally I’d witnessed in Kashmir. The group was protesting against the United States because it recently had been added to the State Department’s list of groups designated as terrorist organizations. Then there was Lebanon, where I’d traveled deep into the Hezbollah-held south.

If only.

No, these frontline warriors in the global war on terrorism at Homeland Security had far more pressing issues to question me about. “Why did you infringe on the Boston Celtics’ copyright in Boston in 2003?” asked my case officer, Malik – ironically a Pakistani – from behind his high desk. Uh, because I used to sell T-shirts outside sporting events, I said, wondering what this had to do with national security.

“You’ve got a long record,” he said. Sure, for peddling “Yankees Suck” T-shirts – sans permit, which isn’t a crime but a code violation – not for promoting “Bin Laden Rulz!” DVDs or the “Idiot’s Guide to Suicide Bombing.”

“You know, we could have you sent up to Boston for the unresolved T-shirt infractions,” Malik said. “But what we’re holding you for is an NYPD bench warrant from 2004. You were in a fight with a parking attendant . . . and then missed a court date.” All true. But how and why does Homeland Security share the NYPD’s jurisdiction in cases unrelated to counter-terrorism? A fight over a parking space hardly counts as terrorism.

“We’re calling NYPD to come to pick you up,” Malik told me, without asking a single question about Pakistan, terrorism, Islam or madrasas.

So I sat and waited. Four DHS officers working two cases – a Senegalese guy who was caught with $100,000 in a suitcase and mine – couldn’t even get the NYPD on the phone. A debate then broke out among Malik, his co-worker and their boss about how to call the NYPD. Six hours later, the DHS still hadn’t gotten word from the NYPD. A shift change was coming up, and officers aren’t allowed to leave until finishing all their cases.

Instead of protecting the homeland from such a dangerous T-shirt-selling, off-road-rager like me, Malik set me free, so he could get home in time to watch Mike and the Mad Dog (“Eh, is Pedro pitchin’ tonight?” I overheard an officer ask). As he closed out my paperwork, Malik asked, “So, ah, Mr. LeMoine, why did you miss that court date anyway?”

“I was in Iraq.”

“Doing what? Like a contractor, soldier?”

“No. I had volunteered to run a humanitarian program for the Coalition Provisional Authority but left when they started killing Westerners.”

“Damn terrorists. Take care of that warrant. And welcome home.”

Welcome home, indeed.

Homeland Security, the $40-billion-a-year agency set up to combat terrorism after 9/11, has been given universal jurisdiction and can hold anyone on Earth for crimes unrelated to national security – even me for a court date I missed while I was in Iraq helping America deter terror – without asking what I had been doing in Pakistan among Islamic extremists the agency is designated to stop.

Instead, some of its actions are erasing the lines of jurisdiction between local police and the federal state, scarily bringing the words “police” and “state” closer together. As long as we allow Homeland Security to act like a Keystone Stasi, terrorism will continue to win in destroying our freedom.

Ray LeMoine is co-author, with Jeff Neumann and Donovan Webster, of “Babylon by Bus,” an account of LeMoine and Neumann’s experiences working for the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq.

Original at http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-oplem194788259jun19,0,6463888.story

(c) Copyright 2006 Ray LeMoine and Newsday.


Fair Use Notice

This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, social and cultural issues, etc., especially as relating to alternative views of the September 11th events, which are a primary concern of this site. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.