Griffin Takes Powerful New Approach to 9/11 Truth
by Tod Fletcher
March 15, 2008
9/11 CONTRADICTIONS by David Ray Griffin is the fifth of his books to examine
the official account of the events of September 11, 2001. This brilliant and highly
readable book takes a new yet simple approach to the truth about 9/11. It focuses
entirely on contradictory statements made by members of the Bush administration,
government departments and agencies, and official bodies such as the 9/11 Commission.
All the statements that Griffin examines are official claims in direct conflict
with other official claims. How could this be? Why would the government keep changing
“the official story”? The public, of course, is expected to take all
the statements as incontrovertibly true, yet they directly conflict with one another.
And why, if the government pronouncements are contradictory, haven’t members
of Congress and the mainstream media launched investigations to determine which
are true and which are false, and to ask why are obvious falsehoods about the
events of 9/11 being promulgated by the government? I say “obvious falsehoods”
because, as Griffin explains in the Preface, “If [Transportation Secretary
Norman] Mineta said “P,” that is a fact. If the 9/11 Commission said
“not P,” that is a fact. And it is a fact that “P” and “not
P” cannot both be true” (p. viii). The subtitle, “An Open Letter
to Congress and the Press,” indicates Griffin’s hope that the juxtaposition
of the contradictory claims the book provides will stimulate such investigations.
But the book is really intended for the public at large, and its clear focus
makes it the easiest to read of all Griffin’s books on 9/11. Because of its
relative simplicity it is a perfect introduction to the subject.
Drawing on government publications, media reports, testimony from the 9/11
Commission hearings, oral histories from the Fire Department of New York, and
other official sources, Griffin documents masterfully 25 of the most serious
contradictions, divided into five parts:
“Part I. Questions about Bush Administration and Pentagon Leaders,”
reveals the contradictory claims about the activities of George Bush, Dick Cheney,
Richard Myers, Donald Rumsfeld and Ted Olson. In this part Griffin shows that
Bush’s long stay at the Florida school was initially confirmed and later denied
by the White House, that various government spokespersons and the 9/11 Commission
could not agree on where Cheney, Myers and Rumsfeld were at key times that morning,
and that DOJ Solicitor General Ted Olson’s claims to have received phone calls
from his wife on Flight 77 were directly contradicted by the DOJ’s FBI.
“Part II. Questions about the US Military,” explores the many contradictions
within government claims about when the military was alerted to the emergencies
on the flights, whether the military could have shot down Flight 93, and whether
it had envisioned 9/11-type attacks prior to that day.
“Part III. Questions about Osama bin Laden & the Hijackers,”
examines the contradictions in official claims about the religious devotion
of the alleged hijackers, where the luggage with the Arabic-language flight
manuals, attributed to Mohamed Atta, was found, whether cell phone calls from
the flights provided evidence of hijackers, and the existence of hard evidence
for Osama bin Laden’s responsibility.
“Part IV. Questions about the Pentagon,” spotlights contradictions
in the official account of Hani Hanjour’s flying skills, what caused the large
hole in the interior C Ring wall of the building, and whether a sophisticated
US military reconnaissance plane was overhead during the attack.
“Part V. Questions about the World Trade Center,” exposes the contradictions
in Rudy Giuliani’s account of his foreknowledge of the catastrophic collapse
of the Twin Towers, in the official claims about explosions in the towers and
WTC 7 before they disintegrated, and in official statements concerning the presence
of molten steel in the subbasements after the buildings came down.
When examined under Griffin’s microscope, it becomes clear that the “official
story” has kept changing over time, just like the stories criminals tell
as they are interrogated. As holes in the government’s explanations of the incomprehensible
events opened up under questioning, to some degree from the press but primarily
from the 9/11 truth movement, they were plugged by new claims. And virtually
all of the new claims have been accepted by the press and Congress without asking
how they could be true in light of the earlier, contradictory claims. You don’t
need to be a conspiracy theorist to see that when the story keeps changing,
doubt is cast on all of its versions. Any police investigator knows this, as
should investigative journalists and elected representatives.
Of course, if Congress and the press won’t do their jobs, it’s up to the rest
of us. With this authoritative dissection of the conflicting statements of the
principal suspects, Griffin has done much of the pre-trial legwork already.
The American public should not allow his selfless devotion to truth and justice
to be squandered by inaction. This may be one of those things that representatives
just cannot do for us.
Get the book at Amazon.com