Browse by Category
Graphic image for 9/11 foreknowledge
Graphic: unanswered questions
Graphic of paper shredder- destruction of evidence
Graphic: conflict of interest
Cui bono graphic
Alleged Hijacker graphic
9/11 Commission Shield

Federal Judge in Germany: Numerous 9/11 Theories Screaming For Investigation

CleanPrintBtn gray smallPdfBtn gray smallEmailBtn gray small

Afghanistan War – Right to Self Defense Highly Questionable

December, 15, 2009
http://www.911video.de/news/151209/indexen.html

Federal Judge Dieter Deiseroth: It is very unfortunate that
the media are not prepared to face the issue of 9/11 and ask the unanswered
questions

Question: Do you think the proposal of an independent 9/11
investigation is realistic?

Judge Dieter Deiseroth: I think the suggestion is reasonable
and necessary. Because the official investigation is the central justification
for the war ( “Operation Enduring Freedom”) and for serious alterations of the
U.S. legal system under the so-called homeland security legislation.

Question: This should be difficult because neither politics
nor the big media, dare to critically question the official version of 9/11.

Judge Dieter Deiseroth: If the official story of 9/11 is further
effectively disseminated by all governments – then it is very costly and difficult
because of the effect of solidified public opinion to question it . A major
research effort is needed and extensive research, time and monetary resources
must be available, which is difficult in a time when resources in the newsrooms
are being cut down.

But then after all, even the construct of lies to justify the Iraq war was brought
down. We now know that the Bush administration, in terms of credibility and veracity,
was anything but trustworthy. It is unfortunate that many within the media,
are still not sufficiently prepared to face the issue of 9 / 11 and the open
unanswered questions . Maybe also because of the abyss that becomes clear then.

Question: Not too long ago alternative explanations of the
9/11 terrorist attacks in the US were discussed.

Judge Dieter Deiseroth: Indeed. Parliamentarians of the Democratic
Party of Japan, which has won the last election in a landslide, for about 2
years in the Japanese parliament, have repeatedly questioned the official Bush
version of 9 / 11 with very serious arguments and demanded explanations. Something
like this did not take place in German parliament, which is rather unfortunate.

Question: But the alternative theories of 9 / 11 also have
many shortcomings.

Judge Dieter Deiseroth: This is absolutely correct. I can
warn to replace the official conspiracy theory of the Bush administration with
hasty drawn alternative conspiracy theories. If the critics of the official
version really want to achieve a new national or international investigation
into the attacks of 9 / 11, then they must impose the highest levels of integrity,
fact-orientation and openness to possible objections. The only way they can
avoid to discredit their own arguments, for example by Conjecture and speculation
disguised as evidence. I assert: On both sides, that is, both at the official
presentation of the Bush administration with the 9/11-Commission Report and
on the alternative side with it’s many counter-theories there is a sea of questions
and also a sea of blatant untruth. This fact is almost screaming for explanations.

Question: Can the military engagement in Afghanistan be based
on international law’s right of self-defense? Did 9/11 not give the U.S. the
right to defend itself and its allies a reason for an emergency?

Judge Dieter Deiseroth: We need to realize that the (military)
right to self defense, as guaranteed in Article 51 of the UN Charter, in general,
may be obtained only in cases where a state is attacked militarily (“if an armed
attack occurs”). It must be, therefore, a current military offensive act, which
is currently carried out immediately present or imminent. Furthermore, this
right to self-defense may only be directed at the state which initiated an attack,
or to which an attack can be attributed.

The entire interview in German:
http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/31/31729/1.html

Dieter Deiseroth, born 1950, studied law, sociology and political science. From
1977 to 1983 Research Fellow at the University of Giessen and lawyer. PhD in
Law. Since 1983, administrative judge in Düsseldorf, from 1989 to 1991 at the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe. Then Chief Judge of the Administrative Court in Münster and Head of the Data Protection Agency of North Rhine-Westphalia. Since 2001 judge at the German Federal Administrative Court.