by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
In the weeks before the 9/11 attacks, warnings poured in from the world’s spy agencies, but U.S. officials did nothing. Instead, our intelligence agencies were reined in, air interceptors grounded, and the attacks exploited to launch a devastating war on Afghanistan. The results: a U.S. corporate takeover of Central Asia’s oil and gas – a wealthier Bush family – and more censorship.
The War On Freedom is an explosive exposé that rips apart the veil of silence surrounding 9/11, and lets readers look at the facts for themselves.
Was the attack on America to open the door for a more aggressive U.S. foreign policy – and uncurbed surveillance of the American people? Compiled from hundreds of newspapers, experts and official documents, “The War On Freedom” is the definitive account of how and why America was attacked.
“What did this administration know, and when did they know it?”
Links to many online video and audio resources from the International Inquiry into 9-11. Phase 1: San Francisco, March 26-28, 2004. and Phase 2: Toronto, May 25-31, 2004. And two video clips from Clarity.
International Citizens’ Inquiry into 9/11
Phase 1: San Francisco, March 26-28, 2004
Phase 2: Toronto, May 25-31, 2004
Phase 3: The Summer of Truth
New York City, Aug. 27-Sept. 11 & beyond
(Phase 4: Paradigm Shift Worldwide?)
9/11 BUSTERS: Video from San Francisco by Ken Jenkins & Hummux
The entire San Francisco inquiry can be downloaded here. More than 20 speakers. Coming soon: Toronto.
SNOWSHOE FILMS: Video from San Francisco & Toronto
One-on-one interviews and video footage of speakers at the San Francisco and Toronto Inquiries:
Ralph Schoenman on the history of false-flag terror attacks. Mike Ruppert on the 9/11 standdown and evidence of prior knowledge. Sept. 11 widow Ellen Mariani (suing the Bush administration) and her attorney Phil Berg. Joyce Lynn (The 9/11 Cover-up Commission). Webster Tarpley (Deconstructing the 9/11 Myth). Jim Marrs (Inside Job). Nafeez Ahmed (The War on Freedom). Barrie Zwicker (The Great Conspiracy). Bruce Gagnon (Arsenal of Hypocrisy). Gray Brechin (on the archaeology of war and energy). Ken Jenkins (Psychological Aspects of 9/11). Dave Rovics plays “Reichstag Fire.” … and much more …
Scroll down for a rich selection of San Francisco audio tapes: Opening Press Conference, March 26, 2004 (group effort by leading researchers and activists – an excellent to 9/11 research and the truth movement).… Continue reading
The events of Sept. 11 had a big impact in Germany, as they did everywhere else.
Millions of Germans took to the streets to show their solidarity with the people of New York and Washington. Germany passed its own version of the PATRIOT ACT. German forces joined the Afghanistan mission and are still heading it today.
Many building blocks of the official story and much of the evidence that causes skeptics to doubt it comes from Germany. Germany was home until 2000 to the members of the “Hamburg cell,” which allegedly provided three of the hijacking pilots. The only two prosecutions of alleged attack plotters – the Motassadeq and Mzoudi cases – were tried in Hamburg in 2002 and 2003. Both cases were voided after U.S. authorities refused to provide evidence that supposedly incriminated the two men.
German opinion about Sept. 11 began to shift as the Bush regime spited its former allies and told outrageous lies in the drive to attack Iraq. In the summer of 2003, several German books presenting alternate views of 9/11 became instant best-sellers. A poll showed that 20 percent of Germans believed the U.S. government likely had a hand in engineering the attacks.
All this served to set off a German “Summer of 9/11.” The first major international research conference of 9/11 skeptics, “UNANSWERED QUESTIONS – DEMANDING ANSWERS,” was held in Berlin on Sept. 7, 2003. Among the American and British speakers were former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney and authors Michael Ruppert, Nafeez Ahmed,… Continue reading
|Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harborby Robert Stinnet — The definitive book (and documentation) exposing FDR’s set up of Pearl Harbor to enrage Americans into joining the “Great War.”|
|Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor- Great BBC Video on the same theme with the same bitter revelations.|
|The Men Who Killed Kennedy– These six carefully researched videos systematically demolish the Warren Commission whitewash and represent the History Channel’s finest hour(s).|
|Coverup – Behind the Iran-Contra AffairIf the recent week-long Reagan schmaltz fest made you a little nauseous, this forgotten rotten history may help you remember why.|
|Panama DeceptionOne more brutal, phony and censored war with another uppity puppet that we made.|
|Waco: The… Continue reading|
A Review of “The New Pearl Harbor”
By Marc Estrin
The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11
David Ray Griffin
Olive Branch Press, 2004
Paper, 214 pp, $15.00
The official story goes something like this:
With no actionable warning from intelligence agencies, four planes were hijacked by terrorists on the morning of September 11, 2001. Two crashed into the Word Trade Center, which then collapsed, and shortly thereafter, the third into the Pentagon. The last plane went down in Pennsylvania after a struggle between passengers and hijackers. Air defense arrived too late to stop the catastrophes. Responding to this attack on the homeland, the president declared a global war on terror which may last for generations until evil is finally eradicated, the security of America firmly established, and the world made safe for freedom and democracy.
In The New Pearl Harbor, David Ray Griffin compiles the evidence that every single assertion in the official story is implausible or impossible, and that something other must explain the inconsistencies and contra-factual assertions.
The implications of the accumulated evidence is that the Bush administration was complicit in the events of September 11th, and not merely a victim of structural problems or incompetence on the part of the intelligence establishment. In a nuanced discussion of “complicity”, Griffin distinguishes eight possible levels, from the lying about events to maximize political ends, through intentionally allowing expected attacks, to actual involvement in the planning of them.
Griffin does not make specific accusations, nor does he hypothesize a “true” version of what happened. But he does demand unflinching investigations of all the contradictions, clear reporting of the results, and most difficult, a courageous drawing of conclusions, no matter how “unthinkable” or outrageous they may appear.
Excellent review of Griffin’s tour de force by the intrepid Counterpunch crew, one of the few lefty journals willing to even look at that day.
In the months since the book was published, we have been swamped with news from the 9/11 Commission concerning both domestic and foreign intelligence which indicated a large and imminent attack on the United States. But the Commission, its members appointed by President Bush, is focusing on the future. According to Vice-Chair Lee Hamilton, “We’re not interested in trying to assess blame…” Their goal is to understand what happened so as to restructure intelligence so that such “a breakdown” may not happen again. Given this limited mandate, almost none of the contradictions Griffin raises is likely to be discussed, or its ramifications analyzed before the case is closed.
The first part of The New Pearl Harbor looks in detail at the timeline and events of 9/11 itself. How is it, Griffin asks, that even the first airplane was not intercepted — given standard procedures, operating normally many times a year, for off-course or otherwise anomalous aircraft? The FAA, NORAD, and the NMCC (National Military Command Center at the Pentagon) have a clear and working set of standard operating procedures which on September 11th, and on that day only, failed to operate. Griffin lays them out, along with the strange, and changing official excuses for their “failure”. Continue reading