The Defense Production Act (Pub.L. 81-774) is a United States law enacted on September 8, 1950, in response to the start of the Korean War. It was part of a broad civil defense and war mobilization effort in the context of the Cold War. Its implementing regulations, the Defense Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS), are located at 15 CFR §§700 to 700.93. The Act has been periodically reauthorized and amended, and remains in force as of 2012.
The Act contains three major sections. The first authorizes the President to require businesses to sign contracts or fulfill orders deemed necessary for national defense. The second authorizes the President to establish mechanisms (such as regulations, orders or agencies) to allocate materials, services and facilities to promote national defense. The third section authorizes the President to control the civilian economy so that scarce and/or critical materials necessary to the national defense effort are available for defense needs.[1]
The Act also authorizes the President to requisition property, force industry to expand production and the supply of basic resources, impose wage and price controls, settle labor disputes, control consumer and real estate credit, establish contractual priorities, and allocate raw materials to aid the national defense.[1]
The President's authority to place contracts under the DPA is the part of the Act most often used by the Department of Defense (DOD) since the 1970s. Most of the other functions of the Act are administered by the Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security (SIES) in the Bureau of Industry and Security in the Department of Commerce.[2]
- - - - - -
Note: Of course, this editor recommends you go READ the Executive Order itself at whitehouse.gov.
By Brandon Turbeville
March 18, 2012
Activist
Post
In a stunning move, on March 16, 2012, Barack Obama signed an Executive
Order (EO) stating that the President and his specifically designated Secretaries
now have the authority to commandeer all domestic U.S. resources including food
and water. The EO also states that the President and his Secretaries have the
authority to seize all transportation, energy, and infrastructure inside the
United States as well as forcibly induct/draft American citizens into the military.
The EO also contains a vague reference in regards to harnessing American citizens
to fulfill “labor requirements” for the purposes of national defense.
Not only that, but the authority claimed inside the EO does not only apply to
National Emergencies and times of war. It also applies in peacetime.
The
National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order exploits the “authority”
granted to the President in the Defense Production Act of 1950 in order to assert
that virtually every means of human survival is now available for confiscation
and control by the President via his and his Secretaries’ whim.
The unconstitutionality of the overwhelming majority of Executive
Orders is well established, as well as the illegality of denying citizens their
basic Constitutional and human rights, even in the event of a legitimate national
emergency. Likewise, it should also be pointed out that, like Obama’s
recent Libyan
adventure and the foregone conclusion of a Syrian
intervention, there is no mention of Congress beyond a minor role of keeping
the allegedly co-equal branch of government informed on contextually meaningless
developments.
As was mentioned above, the scope of the EO is virtually all-encompassing. For
instance, in “Section 201 – Priorities and Allocations Authorities,”
the EO explains that the authority for the actions described in the opening
paragraph rests with the President but is now delegated to the various Secretaries
of the U.S. Federal Government. The list of delegations and the responsibility
of the Secretaries as provided in this section are as follows:
(1) the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;
(2) the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;
(3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;
(4) the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;
(5) the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and
(6) the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.
One need only to read the “Definitions” section of the EO in order to clearly see that terms such as “food resources” is an umbrella that includes literally every form of food and food-related product that could in any way be beneficial to human survival.
That being said, “Section 601 – Secretary of Labor” delegates
special responsibilities to the Secretary of Labor as it involves not just
materials citizens will need for survival, but the actual citizens themselves.
Obviously,
the ability of the U.S. government to induct and draft citizens into the military
against their will is, although a clear violation of their rights, not an issue
considered shocking by its nature of having been invoked so many times in the
past. Logically, this “authority” is provided for in this section.
However, what may be shocking is the fact that Section 601 also provides for the mobilization of “labor” for purposes of the national defense.
Although some subsections read that evaluations are to be made regarding the “effect and demand of labor utilization,” the implication is that “labor” (meaning American workers) will be considered yet one more resource to be seized for the purposes of “national defense.” The EO reads,
Sec. 601. Secretary of Labor. (a) The Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:Notice that the language of the EO does not state “in the event of a national emergency.” Instead, we are given the term “purposes of national defense.” This is because the “authorities” assumed by the President have been assumed not just for arbitrary declarations of “national emergency” but for peacetime as well. Indeed, the EO states this much directly when it says,
(1) collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal of the Nation's workforce needs for purposes of national defense;
(2) upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;
(3) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order, consult with that agency with respect to: (i) the effect of contemplated actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor.
The head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense is delegated the authority of the President under section 107(b)(1) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2077(b)(1), to take appropriate action to ensure that critical components, critical technology items, essential materials, and industrial resources are available from reliable sources when needed to meet defense requirements during peacetime, graduated mobilization, and national emergency.
Presidential Executive Orders have long been used illegally by Presidents of every political shade and have often been used destroy the rights of American citizens. Although history has often come to judge these orders as both immoral and unconstitutional, the fact is that the victims of the orders suffered no less because of the retroactive judgment of their progeny. It is for this reason that we must immediately condemn and resist such obvious usurpation as is currently being attempted by the U.S. government.
Nevertheless, some have no doubt begun to wonder why the President has signed such an order. Not only that, but why did he sign the order now? Is it because of the looming war with Iran or the Third World War that will likely result from such a conflict? Is it because of the ticking time bomb called the economy that is only one jittery move or trade deal away from total disintegration? Is it because of a growing sense of hatred of their government amongst the general public? Is there a coming natural disaster of which we are unaware? Are there plans for martial law?
Whatever the reason for the recent announcement of Obama’s new Executive Order, there is one thing we do know for sure - “It wouldn’t happen here” has been the swan song of almost every victim of democide in modern human history.
For additional information, please listen to the 2-hour discussion at The
Intel Hub
Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Mullins, South Carolina. He has a
Bachelor's Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of three
books, Codex
Alimentarius -- The End of Health Freedom, 7
Real Conspiracies, and Five
Sense Solutions. Turbeville has published over one hundred articles dealing
with a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption,
and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville is available for podcast, radio, and
TV interviews. Please contact us at activistpost (at) gmail.com.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.