A 9/11 Re-Investigation and the Power of Consensus Statements

An Open Letter to Senator Bob Graham, Michael Moore, and Amy Goodman

by David Griffin
October 5, 2011
Foreign Policy Journal

Dear Sen. Graham, Michael Moore, and Amy Goodman:

Regarding your discussions on Democracy Now, September 15th and September 29th, including "Michael Moore Backs Call to Re-Open Investigation of 9/11 Attacks," -- the "best evidence" formulated by the new 9/11 Consensus Panel may be helpful in your quest.

The work of this distinguished expert Panel was first announced in a North America-wide press release on September 9, 2011.

Brief summary of the Panel's function and importance:

The mainstream media has claimed for a decade that it is not in a position to evaluate the technical evidence being presented by the 9/11 Truth Movement against the official narrative of the events of September 11, 2001.

Many in the media perceive a problem in challenging government explanations that they feel are over their heads.

A parallel problem existed in the field of medicine for many years, during which there were contradictory, unranked approaches to medical treatments.

This problem was greatly reduced by the introduction of "evidence-based" medicine.

Using widely accepted verification tools such as the Delphi Method, medicine has now developed hundreds of standard Consensus Statements to guide physicians in diagnosis and treatment.

Similarly, 22 expert members of the new 9/11 Consensus Panel have recently developed 13 Consensus Points of "best evidence" opposing the official account of 9/11.

The respondents, who remained blind to one another throughout the process, provided three rounds of review and feedback that was refined into 13 Points of "best evidence".

This scientific process has yielded an unprecedented degree of credibility for specific points of evidence opposing the official account of the events of September 11, 2001.

These Points, developed by a multi-disciplinary team of professionals, offer the media the confidence it needs to promote serious discussion about this world-changing event and its continuing fallout. The Points, their methodology, and information on the Panel are available at consensus911.org.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. David Ray Griffin, author, Co-founder, 9/11 Consensus Panel
William Veale, attorney, Panel Co-founder
Elizabeth Woodworth, medical librarian, Panel Co-founder

On behalf of:
Dr. Robert Bowman, former Director of "Star Wars"
Mr. David Chandler, physicist and mathematician
Giulietto Chiesa, Italian journalist and former member of the European Parliament
Dwain Deets, former engineering director at NASA
Tod Fletcher, M.A., professor of history
Lt. Col. David Gapp, U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator
Dr. Niels Harrit, Associate Professor of Chemistry Emeritus, Univ. of Copenhagen
Dr. Steven E. Jones, Professor Emeritus of Physics, Brigham Young Univ.
Commander Ralph Kolstad, 20 years US Navy fighter pilot
Lt. Col. Shelton F. Lankford, 20 years US Marine Corps pilot
Dr. Graeme MacQueen, Prof. Emeritus, McMaster University, Canada
Massimo Mazzucco, award-winning filmmaker, screenwriter, and journalist
Dennis P. McMahon, attorney, member of NY and Mass. Bars
Rowland Morgan, Univ. of Cambridge (Hon.), journalist, author
Frances Shure, licensed professional counselor
Lou Stolzenberg, retired physical therapist
Daniel Sunjata, American actor in film, television and theater
Dr. Matthew Witt, Associate Professor of Public Administration
Dr. Jonathan B. Weisbuch (M.D.,M.P.H.), former Chief Health Officer
Dr. Paul Zarembka, Professor of Economics, SUNY at Buffalo
Barrie Zwicker, Canadian journalist and author

Contact: consensus911 [at) gmail dot com

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.