Notice: Use of undefined constant DISCLAIMER - assumed 'DISCLAIMER' in /home1/improba1/public_html/911truth/includes/fair_social.php on line 3
Notice: Use of undefined constant FAIR_USE - assumed 'FAIR_USE' in /home1/improba1/public_html/911truth/includes/fair_social.php on line 10
Tuesday, November 24 2009 - In the Media
Audio + Images: 9/11 Truth Address By Richard Gage
Tuesday, 24 November 2009
On the afternoon of Saturday the 21st in Wellington American architect and internationally acclaimed speaker Richard Gage addressed a captivated audience of around 630 people at Te Papa's Soundings Theatre. Gage presented evidence calling into question the official version of the events which led to the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings in New York on the 11th of September 2001.
Click to enlarge
In a Radio New Zealand Interview with Kim Hill on the morning before the presentation Richard Gage, who was the founding member Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, was dismissed as a 'conspiracy theorist'.
In the interview Gage spoke of the considerable similarity between the collapse of building seven of the world trade center and the demolition of similar buildings through controlled demolition - and he attempted to explain how and why this evidence calls for a better explanation (click for video footage).
Gage also cited evidence supporting a claim that nano-thermite technologyplayed a part in the collapse of the Twin Towers.
The later presentation at Te Papa attracted an audience of around 630 people including dozens of architects and engineers.
At the beginning a quick vote by raised hands revealed that the audience was made up of both dissenters to the official story, staunch believers of the 'official story', and many who were undecided.
The majority of the evidence presented by Gage was based on scientific observation including a lot of analysis of physical factors which were accepted in the official report as not requiring further inquiry.
At no point did Gage insist that his evidence was beyond challenge, and his central argument was to say that the volume of evidence uncovered clearly calls for an additional inquiry, and displays element of procedural impropriety in the official inquiry report of the 911 Commission.
At the end of the presentation a second straw poll found that there were only half a dozen people not concerned by the accuracy of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) & 9/11 Commission's version of events.
Click to enlarge
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.