Notice: Use of undefined constant DISCLAIMER - assumed 'DISCLAIMER' in /home1/improba1/public_html/911truth/includes/fair_social.php on line 3
Notice: Use of undefined constant FAIR_USE - assumed 'FAIR_USE' in /home1/improba1/public_html/911truth/includes/fair_social.php on line 10
Monday, August 29 2005 - Resources and Materials
The Case for Demolitions
Although there is not complete consensus on this issue within the 9/11 truth movement, here is a collection of articles, many of them by Jim Hoffman, arguing that the WTC buildings must have been demolished using explosives. Plus a few past milestones on the evidence. Judge for yourselves...
Taking a Closer Look: Hard Science and the Collapse of the World Trade Center
"Building a Better Mirage. NIST's 3-Year $20,000,000 Cover-Up of the Crime of the Century." Responds to the official final report on the WTC collapses by the US National Institutes for Standards and Technology (from 911research.wtc7.net)
Popular Mechanics Attacks Its "9/11 LIES" Straw Man by Jim Hoffman (See also: Popular Mechanics' Deceptive Smear Against 9/11 Truth. Very comprehensive, illustrated treatment.)
UL Executive Speaks Out on WTC Study (Kevin Ryan)
Ongoing Developments: the New York tapes
Older Puzzle Pieces:
9/11/01: NY Fire Department chief of safety [Link no longer live] (video) told TV reporters there were "bombs" and "secondary devices," which caused the explosions in the buildings.
Silverstein on WTC 7: "Pull It" (2002, first noticed by researchers in early 2004)
The history of WTC 7 - headquarters to CIA, SEC and OEM, compiled by John Horne
Group, owner of WTC 7 mortgage (sort of like The Carlyle Group, but possibly worse)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.