New to 9-11 Research? 
- 9/11 Victims' Families' Review of 9/11 Commission Report
- The Facts Speak for Themselves Well-sourced listing of facts about 9/11, updated regularly, hosted at 911TruthNews.com
- Complete 9/11 Timeline and Loss of Civil Liberties Since 9/11, Searchable database resources from 'mainstream' sources
- 9-11 Research: An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001 (Outstanding, well- organized, solid research)
- Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story of September 11th, 2001
- Nanothermite information Why were military-grade explosive chips found in the towers' dust throughout Lower Manhattan? Peer-reviewed paper, more information and summary.
- Beginners' Guide to 9/11 Truth from Journal of 9/11 Studies
- A Quick Course on the shortest paths to 9/11 truth...
- Justice For 9/11 Complaint and Petition filed with NY Attorney General Elliot Spitzer November, 2004. The complete legal case, as of that date.
- 9/11 Commission -- One Year Later PDF Report of 7/05 Hearings sponsored by Rep. Cynthia McKinney
- Who's asking questions? ... Patriotsquestion911.com
-Information, disinformation, misinformation... this, this and this will help readers sort wheat from chaff.
Professionals for 9/11 Truth 
Alternative Media Links 
9/11 NEWS/FORUMS

911truthnews
Truth Phalanx
The truth: Plain and Simple
911Blogger
Rigorous Intuition


NEWSWIRES

dailycensored.com CLG Information Clearing House
Media Freedom
BLOGS, MORE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM
>BoilingFrogsPost.com
>George Washington's Blog
>WhoWhatWhy?
>Globalresearch.ca
Community Currency

>MadCowProductions
>Mapping the Real Deal, Catherine Austin Fitts
>911debunkers.blogspot.com
>Nafeez Ahmed's Cutting Edge
>Mark Crispin Miller
>Michael Collins
>Secrecy News-FAS Project on Government Secrecy

RADIO/AUDIO/VIDEO
(& associated blogs...)

Project Censored Radio
Project Censored Radio with hosts Mickey Huff & Peter Phillips


Boiling Frogs

No Lies Radio

Guns & Butter
Investigating capitalism, militarism & politics

Diverse, always fascinating ... :electric politics


Flashpoints

>Law and Disorder Radio
>Free Speech Radio News

Excellent Podcast Archive at:

Visisbility9-11



COMIC RELIEF

The Big Lie Comic Book

Comic News

Letter from Open Government Groups to Senate Armed Services Committee re. Nomination of William J. Lynn III

January 23, 2009
Project on Government Oversight

Honorable Carl Levin, Chairman
U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services
228 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Honorable John McCain, Ranking Member
U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services
228 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Chairman Levin and Senator McCain,

The undersigned groups commends you, Chairman Levin, for your decision to wait to evaluate the impact of President Obama's new revolving door restrictions requiring appointees to recuse themselves from work related to their former employer or clients, as well as from matters or issues for which he lobbied. Proceeding with the nomination of William J. Lynn III, a former Raytheon Company lobbyist, to the position of Deputy Secretary of Defense clearly violates President Obama's Executive Order (EO). We believe your cautious approach is an important exercise of congressional oversight. Upon reviewing the President's just released EO and its waiver provisions we urge you to go one step further and reject the nomination of Mr. Lynn.

This letter is not to suggest that Mr. Lynn is not qualified for the position. Before the President issued his Ethics Commitment by Executive Branch Personnel Executive Order, there would have been little ground for questioning the proposed nomination of Mr. Lynn. However, given that the new pledge required by President Obama is written to preclude any appointee from participating "in any particular matter on which I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment," or accepting "employment with any executive agency that I lobbied within the 2 years before the date of my appointment," the undersigned groups believe that Mr. Lynn simply could not effectively serve as the Deputy Secretary of Defense.

As the EO is written, a waiver can only be issued for Mr. Lynn if "the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, or his or her designee, certifies in writing (i) that the literal application of the restriction is inconsistent with the purposes of the restriction, or (ii) that it is in the public interest to grant the waiver." The EO then goes on to define the public interest to "include, but not be limited to, exigent circumstances relating to national security or to the economy. De minimis contact with an executive agency shall be cause for a waiver of the restrictions." Furthermore, Congress should inquire into whether Lynn ever lobbied the Department of Defense. It is hard to see how Mr. Lynn's nomination would meet the spirit of these standards for a waiver.

USASpending.gov reports that Mr. Lynn's former employer--the Raytheon Company--was the fourth largest contractor for the Department of Defense in FY2008, receiving over $10 billion in contracts with all three military services. Moreover, his lobbying disclosure forms reveal that he was part of a lobbying team on budget and appropriations issues, including the Department of Defense Appropriations Bill, acquisition policy, missile defense, and Foreign Military Financing. As a result, the nomination causes an impossible conflict: confirming Mr. Lynn as Deputy Secretary of Defense, waiving him from the ethics standards, would be a frontal violation of the revolving door reforms; yet confirming him without a waiver and requiring him to recuse himself from matters that affect Raytheon would make it impossible for him to effectively serve in his position.

Although the undersigned had hoped for a proven reformer to become the number two person at the Pentagon, Mr. Lynn's lack of such a record was not cause for objecting to his confirmation. The questions raised at Mr. Lynn's confirmation hearing made clear that the committee is well aware of how desperately the Department of Defense is in need of reform.

However, Mr. Lynn's responses to Senator Claire McCaskill's questions about his second problematic turn through the revolving door do nothing to assuage the concerns she raised. Mr. Lynn's response was that he will simply follow the letter of the law.

Senator McCain, you have a long record of raising concerns about the negative impact of the revolving door between the defense industry and public service. You have repeatedly introduced measures in the annual National Defense Authorization Act to track the movement of public officials moving through the revolving door, successfully passing a measure to require disclosure in the FY08 Defense Authorization bill.

We fully endorse President Obama's new ethics standards regarding the revolving door. It is for that reason that we do not want those standards undermined or compromised by the confirmation of Mr. Lynn. Given the urgent need for reform at the Pentagon, and the significant conflict Mr. Lynn faces as a former Raytheon lobbyist, the following groups urge the Committee to reject the nomination of Mr. Lynn.

Sincerely,

Project On Government Oversight (POGO)
Danielle Brian, Executive Director

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
Melanie Sloan, Executive Director

Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW)
Tom Schatz, President

Government Accountability Project (GAP)
Mark Cohen, Executive Director

Public Citizen
Craig Holman, Legislative Representative

Source URL: http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/letters/government-corruption/gc-rd-20090123.html

Share on Facebook   newsvine   digg this!   Stumble It!   reddit   del.icio.us   google   yahoo   icerocket   magnoliacom
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
home   |   about us   |   contact   |   research   |   grassroots   |   calendar   |   links   |   search