Tuesday, January 13 2009 - Other Important News
Will We Get Accountability? Obama's Reply to Blogger Bob Fertik's Special Prosecutor Question
January 12, 2009
As Bush gives his final press conference today, lamenting the "mistakes" of his presidency, some are wondering if he and other members of his administration will get a chance to tell such tales to a special prosecutor.
"History will look back,'' he told reporters, most likely hoping the next administration's Justice Department will solely look forward. Judging from the most recent comments from his successor, that may very well be the case.
Fertik submitted the question to Change.gov, the official transition Web site for the incoming Obama Administration. The site has a forum called "Open for Questions" where people can post items of particular concern for the Obama team to review. Fertik's question got so much attention and approval from other users on the site that it made its way to the top of the Change.gov list and onto the Sunday talk shows, finally garnering this response from Obama when George Stephanopoulos asked the question directly:
Obama also signaled a degree of independence for Eric Holder, his nominee for attorney general, saying that "his job is to uphold the Constitution and look after the interests of the American people, not to be swayed my day-to-day politics. So, ultimately, he's going to be making some calls."
Fertik said the popularity of the question he posted did not surprise him. In a phone interview with BuzzFlash, he said that while "there has not been a lot of passion for accountability on some of the bigger blogs," it is "ordinary citizens who have been waiting for" this issue to come to the fore.
Fertik has seen the interest in prosecuting Bush Administration officials for various crimes grow recently. His site hosts a petition addressed to Holder calling for investigation and prosecution of Bush Administration officials. Holder responded to the hundreds of e-mails generated by the petition, writing to the group, "I hear you."
"It's been an open secret. George Bush admits that he authorized torture. Dick Cheney admits that he authorized torture," Fertik said. Obama, however, has been less forthright on the subject. Fertik was frustrated by the president-elect's response on ABC's This Week.
"It was a dodge. It was evasive," Fertik said. He said that, judging from what Obama said, the best case scenario is that Obama will let Holder make the decision of whether or not to appoint a special prosecutor. The worse case scenario, he said, is that Obama will pull Holder aside and tell him not to pursue the issue.
While some progressives may be holding out hope that Obama is simply waiting until he gets into the Oval Office to declare his support for the appointment of a special prosecutor, Fertik says people can take Obama at his word.
"Obama does not play poker; that's not his leadership style," Fertik said. "If you want to know what Obama will do, look carefully at what he says. He has no intention of appointing a special prosecutor, but he might let Eric Holder do so."
Obama said in his interview with Stephanopoulos that he feared an investigation may make some in the CIA "feel like they've got to spend all their time looking over their shoulders and lawyering." Fertik has an idea of a good way to ensure that doesn't happen.
"Start at the top. The people who are most deserving of prosecution -- Bush and Cheney -- will not be working in the CIA after Jan. 20th," he said. "[An investigation] will not interfere with the CIA... all the professionals within the CIA do not want to work alongside torturers."
Without a declaration from either Holder or Obama on the subject, some are looking at the incoming White House staff for a clue. Some progressives refer to the appointment of Dawn Johnsen as head of the Office of Legal Council as a positive sign for this movement. Earlier this year, Johnsen wrote this on the topic, "How do we restore our nation's honor?" for Slate.com:
Fertik said he is heartened by Obama's pick of Johnsen, but said that "it's offset by other appointments," namely John Brennan, whom Obama has chosen as his top counterterrorism advisor. Brennan has been the target of criticism for his support for forced rendition and other controversial CIA tactics.
Obama‘s final word to Fertik (via Stephanopoulos) was this:
"When it comes to national security, what we have to focus on is getting things right in the future, as opposed to looking at what we got wrong in the past."
All this talk of looking forward warrants a look back. In the last-minute pardon scramble of President George H.W. Bush's final weeks in office, some saw an opportunity for a reemergence of justice by calling for accountability in the White House. Others, including incoming President Bill Clinton, saw an opportunity for bipartisanship. The GOP, of course, shared neither view.
"Bill Clinton's decision not to pursue the Iran-Contra scandal did not help him achieve the support of the Republicans. They were at his throat from the day he took office," Fertik said. "That's the danger; that's the precedent that all of us are focused on."
By focusing on lessons from the past, Fertik says, they are looking to the future.
"These people who committed these crimes will come back in the next Republican administration," Fertik warned. "We're the ones who are looking forward by demanding prosecution."
What will it take to get Democrats to listen to calls for the appointment of a special prosecutor? Join the discussion here, and/or share your ideas with Bob Fertik and the rest of the team at Democrats.com.
Source URL: http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/analysis/576
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|home | about us | contact | research | grassroots | calendar | links | search|