2009 Truth Statement
We STILL Want Real Answers
About 9/11

September 11th, 2009
Join with others in endorsing this statement calling for real answers eight years later...
New to 9-11 Research? 
> Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story of September 11th, 2001
> 9/11 Victims' Families' Review of 9/11 Commission Report
> 9-11 Research: An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001 (Outstanding, well- organized, solid research)
> Nanothermite information Why were military-grade explosive chips found in the towers' dust throughout Lower Manhattan? Peer-reviewed paper, more information and summary.
> Beginners' Guide to 9/11 Truth from Journal of 9/11 Studies
> Complete 9/11 Timeline and Loss of Civil Liberties Since 9/11, Searchable database resources from 'mainstream' sources
> A Quick Course on the shortest paths to 9/11 truth...
> Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth'
> Justice For 9/11 Complaint and Petition filed with NY Attorney General Elliot Spitzer November, 2004
> 9/11 Commission -- One Year Later PDF Report of 7/05 Hearings sponsored by Rep. Cynthia McKinney
> Who's asking questions? ... Patriotsquestion911.com
> Information, disinformation, misinformation... this and this will help.
> Mission Statement and Editorial Policy of 911Truth.org
Support 
PLEASE DONATE NOW!
2010 to date:

If it is important to you that 911Truth.org is able to continue, you need to support the organization. Thank you.


Professionals for 9/11 Truth 
Alternative Media Links 
9/11 NEWS/FORUMS
>911blogger.com
>Truthaction.org Forum >Globalresearch.ca
>RigorousIntuition Forum

ABSURD, RIDICULOUS DISINFORMATION
Rediscover911 ... Anonymous, blathering cowards...
For a wonderful response to their pathetic attempt to link the reputable 911truth.org to their disreputable crap see http://www.rediscover911.org/

NEWSWIRES

dailycensored.com
>BoilingFrogsPost.com
>Citizens for Legitimate Government
>Information Clearinghouse
>InformationLiberation.com


BLOGS
>George Washington's Blog
>911debunkers.blogspot.com
>Scott Ford
>Mark Crispin Miller--News From Underground Blog
>GlennGreenwald 'Unclaimed Territory'
>Austin Fitts 'Mapping the Real Deal'
>Nafeez Ahmed 'The Cutting Edge'
>BeatTheChip - Stop RealID/PASS

RADIO/AUDIO/VIDEO

electric politics

>Guns & Butter ... Investigating capitalism, militarism and politics, Wed., 1pmPacific
>Law and Disorder Radio: The great civil liberties attorney Bill Kunstler saw it coming. "The police state is emerging," he warned. "It's coming piece by piece and at a certain point it will be irreversible."
>Free Speech Radio News
>Global Research News Hour, M-F 10am Central
>Tell Somebody!, Tue., 6pmCentral on KKFI Community Radio



COMIC RELIEF

Comic News

9/11 Movement 
History, strategies, growth
Developing... 
Breaking news & ongoing
stories of special import
In the Media 
When 9/11 truth slips thru
9/11 Consequences 
The downstream battles for
peace, rights and solvency
9/11 Precedents 
How it's done again & again
Flight 93 Shot Down, says Navy Officer?
Update: Janice's mea culpa --
Someone has just brought to my attention a possible interpretation of this statement different than what I had come to, so in the spirit of accurate reporting and non-sensationalism, I am adding this for your consideration. As always, we hope you carefully interpret all information coming to you, no matter what the source, (including ours, of course). My interpretation of these comments was that Stone was simply making the case (the crux of the case) that Hamdan knew the target, therefore Hamdan must have been a party to the attack. I had not considered that Stone may have been (supposedly) quoting Hamdan fully, and that Hamdan may have been the one reported as having said, "If they hadn't shot it down...," not Stone. Nonetheless, it seems quite odd that the US prosecution, led by military officers, would have made any reference to Flight 93 having been shot down... [End of update.]

A couple key points here from the Gitmo show trials not really being shown: 1) Defense attorney for bin Laden's driver, Salim Hamdan, stated: "There will be no evidence that Mr. Hamdan espoused or believed or embraced any form of what you will hear about, radical Islam beliefs, extremist Muslim beliefs." Where have we heard that before? A little like Atta and friends drinking Dewars scotch, paying for lap dances, partying it up... fundamentalist Muslims who hate Americans' 'freedoms'? I think not... 2) "'If they hadn't shot down the fourth plane it would've hit the dome,' Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks." Excuse me? Shot it down? But what about the 'brave passengers' daring revolt' that brought that plane down into a field in Pennsylvania and courageously saved the Capitol or White House?

The Official Myth never held water well, but now it's leaking like a sieve... No wonder they won't let 9/11 victims' family members attend "the most just war crimes trial that anyone has ever seen." (Related: September Eleventh Advocates press release on need for fair trials: They might finally get real answers to some of the 70% of questions they presented to the 9/11 Commission that were never addressed. And it is long past time for real answers.


– Ed.

By Jim Loney
July 22, 2008

GUANTANAMO BAY U.S. NAVAL BASE, Cuba (Reuters) - Osama bin Laden's driver knew the target of the fourth hijacked jetliner in the September 11 attacks, a prosecutor said on Tuesday in an attempt to draw a link between Salim Hamdan and the al Qaeda leadership in the first Guantanamo war crimes trial.

Hamdan's lawyer said in opening statements that the Yemeni, held for nearly seven years before his trial, was just a paid employee of the fugitive al Qaeda leader, a driver in the motor pool who never joined the militant group or plotted attacks on America.

But prosecutor Timothy Stone told the six-member jury of U.S. military officers who will decide Hamdan's guilt or innocence that Hamdan had inside knowledge of the 2001 attacks on the United States because he overheard a conversation between bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri.

"If they hadn't shot down the fourth plane it would've hit the dome," Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks.

The tribunal's chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the "dome" was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.

"Virtually no one knew the intended target, but the accused knew," Stone said.

United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania. U.S. officials have never stated it was shot down although rumors saying that abound to this day.

Hamdan, a father of two with a fourth-grade education, is charged with conspiracy and providing material support for terrorism in the first U.S. war crimes trial since World War Two. He could face life in prison if convicted.

Prosecutors say Hamdan had access to al Qaeda's inner circle. Stone told the jury that Hamdan earned the trust of bin Laden and helped him flee after attacks on U.S. embassies in East Africa in 1998 and the September 11 attacks.

"He served as bodyguard, driver, transported and delivered weapons, ammunition and supplies to al Qaeda," Stone said.

Hamdan was being tried in a hilltop courthouse at the U.S. Navy base in Guantanamo Bay, which has been a lightning rod for criticism of the United States since early 2002, when it began housing a prison camp to hold alleged Taliban and al Qaeda fighters from the battlefields of Afghanistan.

The war crimes tribunal system has been criticized by human rights groups and defense lawyers, some of them U.S. military officers. Detainees have been held for years without charges.

Washington has declared them unlawful enemy combatants not entitled to the rights afforded formal prisoners of war.

Responding to the widespread criticism, Morris, the chief prosecutor, said on Tuesday: "In my opinion they are seeing the most just war crimes trial that anyone has ever seen."

WORKED FOR WAGES

Defense lawyer Harry Schneider described Hamdan as a poor Yemeni who lost his parents at a young age and lived on the streets, where he developed a knack for fixing cars.

"The evidence is that he worked for wages. He didn't wage attacks on America," he said. "He had a job because he had to earn a living, not because he had a jihad against America."

"There will be no evidence that Mr. Hamdan espoused or believed or embraced any form of what you will hear about, radical Islam beliefs, extremist Muslim beliefs," he said.

The first two prosecution witnesses were U.S. military officers who were in Afghanistan during the early days of the U.S. invasion in 2001. Both addressed a key issue at trial -- whether Hamdan had surface-to-air missiles when he was captured at a checkpoint near Takhteh Pol in November 2001.

Defense lawyers dispute the prosecution's contention that Hamdan had the weapons. But a U.S. officer identified only as "Sergeant Major A" said the missiles were found in the "trunk of a car driven by Mr. Hamdan."

He said troops also found a mortar manual with "al Qaeda" on the front, a book by bin Laden and a card issued to al Qaeda fighters and signed by Mullah Omar, the Taliban commander.

Ali Soufan, an al Qaeda expert with the FBI, took the jury through a long description of al Qaeda's hierarchy and called bin Laden "the emir, the prince." He said Hamdan was part of bin Laden's security detail.

"The people who are around bin Laden have to be trusted ... true believers in the cause," he said.

(Editing by Eric Beech)

Source URL: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080723/ts_nm/guantanamo_hearings_hamdan_dc

discuss at twitter   Share on Facebook   newsvine   digg this!   Stumble It!   reddit   del.icio.us   google   yahoo   icerocket   magnoliacom
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
Fair Use Notice
This page contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political issues relating to alternative views of the 9/11 events, etc. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use", you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
home   |   about us   |   contact   |   research   |   store   |   grassroots   |   calendar   |   links   |   search   |   email signup