2009 Truth Statement
We STILL Want Real Answers
About 9/11

September 11th, 2009
Join with others in endorsing this statement calling for real answers eight years later...
New to 9-11 Research? 
> Top 40 Reasons to Doubt the Official Story of September 11th, 2001
> Justice For 9/11 Complaint and Petition filed with NY Attorney General Elliot Spitzer November, 2004
> 9/11 Victims' Families' Review of 9/11 Commission Report
> 9-11 Research: An Attempt to Uncover the Truth About September 11th, 2001 (Outstanding, well- organized, solid research)
> A Quick Course on the shortest paths to 9/11 truth...
> Beginners' Guide to 9/11 Truth from Journal of 9/11 Studies
> 9/11 Commission -- One Year Later PDF Report of 7/05 Hearings sponsored by Rep. Cynthia McKinney
> Complete 9/11 Timeline and Loss of Civil Liberties Since 9/11, Searchable database resources from HistoryCommons.org
> Architects & Engineers for 9/11Truth's Technical Papers
> Who's asking questions? ... Patriotsquestion911.com
> Information, disinformation, misinformation... this and this will help.
> Mission Statement and Editorial Policy of 911Truth.org
Support 
PLEASE DONATE NOW!
2009 to date:

If it is important to you that 911Truth.org is able to continue, we need you to support the organization right away. Thank you.


Link and Subscribe to Us 
We have a variety of banners so you can link to us and an RSS feed so you can syndicate our headlines on your site or receive them in a personal newsreader.
Professionals for 9/11 Truth 
Alternative Media Links 
9/11 NEWS/FORUMS
>911blogger.com
>Truthaction.org Forum >Globalresearch.ca
BLOGS
>George Washington's Blog
>911debunkers.blogspot.com
>Mark Crispin Miller--News From Underground Blog
>RigorousIntuition Forum
>Visibility911.com blogs
>GlennGreenwald 'Unclaimed Territory'
>Austin Fitts 'Mapping the Real Deal'
>Nafeez Ahmed 'The Cutting Edge'
>BeatTheChip - Stop RealID/PASS
NEWSWIRES

>Citizens for Legitimate Government
>Information Clearinghouse
>InformationLiberation.com
dailycensored.com

RADIO/AUDIO

electric politics

>Guns & Butter ... Investigating capitalism, militarism and politics, Wed., 1pmPacific
>Law and Disorder Radio: The great civil liberties attorney Bill Kunstler saw it coming. "The police state is emerging," he warned. "It's coming piece by piece and at a certain point it will be irreversible."
>Free Speech Radio News
>Global Research News Hour, M-F 10am Central
>Tell Somebody!, Tue., 6pmCentral on KKFI Community Radio



PRINT NEWS & COMIC RELIEF

Rock Creek Free Press

Comic News

The 9/11 Key 
Why 9/11 truth is still the
Mother Issue of them all
9/11 Movement 
History, strategies, growth
Developing... 
Breaking news & ongoing
stories of special import
In the Media 
When 9/11 truth slips thru
9/11 Consequences 
The downstream battles for
peace, rights and solvency
9/11 Precedents 
How it's done again & again
9/11 Personal Accounts

Following up on David Ray Griffin?s article published last week, ?Explosive Testimony,? following is another account of personal experience on 9/11. This is the first of several personal accounts we will be posting.

NOTE: Addendum submitted 2/1/06, from David Edwards. Full text follows original account.

?We Saw a Missile Fly into the Pentagon!?
An Account of a Personal Experience

Professor David H. Edwards
January 27, 2006

I have shared with people an experience I had on the morning of September 11, 2001. Recently, it was suggested to me that I write down this experience so that it could be shared more broadly. Here is my response to this suggestion.

On that fateful morning, I, in my capacity as the Bolivia/Peru Country Specialist for Amnesty International-USA, was in Washington, D.C., traveling to the Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill, in order to attend the confirmation hearings for the Bush Administration?s new Drug Czar, which were scheduled to begin at 10:00 AM.

Following my usual commuting pattern, I parked my car at the Anacostia Station of the Metro Line sometime after 9:00 AM, then took the Green Line into L?Enfante Station, where I transferred to the Orange Line on my way to the Capitol South Station.

Immediately after I boarded the Orange Line train, a young man and a young woman, both in their early twenties and wearing backpacks, burst into the subway car, shouting and exhibiting extreme excitement and agitation. They addressed the entire car, which was mostly empty except for me and perhaps three or four other men in suits. The young people yelled: ?We were standing at the Pentagon Station, waiting for the train to come, and we saw a missile fly into the Pentagon! We saw it, we saw it!? One of the men sitting closer to them must have asked for clarification, because they reiterated the same information several times, saying repeatedly: ?A missile, we saw it, a missile, it flew right into the Pentagon. I can?t believe it. Now it?s on fire, there?s smoke!? They continued in this vein from the L?Enfante Plaza Station until I got off at the Capitol South exit.

At the time, I did not know what to think and was, in any case, primarily concerned with hurrying to the Senate Office Building to secure a seat prior to the commencement of the hearings. Once I climbed the steep steps out of the station and ran to the building, however, the doors immediately sprang open and people began to surge out. I asked one of the building security personnel what was happening. He informed me that the buildings were being evacuated and then pointed behind me. I turned and saw smoke billowing from across the river. At that point, I turned and sprinted back down the hill and into the station and managed to get back on the Orange Line and then the Green Line to my car and out of the city, barely ahead of traffic.

Only later did I realize the significance of this event.

David H. Edwards
Professor of Anthropology
Salisbury University
Salisbury, Maryland

ADDENDUM 2/1/2006

Since the account of my experience was posted, there have been some who have taken exception to it on the basis of my statement of where, according to the witnesses, they had been standing when they saw a missile hit the Pentagon. I reported that they said that it was while they were waiting for the train at the Pentagon Station. But the Pentagon Station is underground. In light of this problem, I would add the following points.

1. There are, in fact, places from which the witnesses could have observed the events in question. I have been told that, for example, a person in the vicinity of the bus stop at the Pentagon station could have seen something from the location above the Pentagon station, which would have provided a view to something coming at the Pentagon from the South and partial West; likewise, a person standing outside above the escalator that goes down into the Pentagon City metro from the open patio looking out towards Macy?s would have been in a position to see the impact or something coming in.

2. There is a strong probability that the witnesses were from out of town (they were carrying hiking backpacks) and were unfamiliar with the area. They may, for example, have not known that there is a Pentagon City Station as well as a Pentagon Station. They might, therefore, have wrongly stated the station from which they viewed the event.

3. The witnesses were visibly upset and under extreme duress. This duress may have resulted in imprecision about where they were at the time. They may, for example, have said that they were ?waiting for the train,? which would imply that they were underground, when they meant that they were just about to go down to the station to catch the train.

4. They were repeatedly screaming about what had caused them so much stress ("a missile flew into the Pentagon"), but they were not reiterating the location from which they witnessed the event. Also, far from taking notes on what they were saying, I was having a distracting mental image of a nuclear missile strike on Washington DC. It may be, therefore, that they stated their location correctly but that I misinterpreted what they said.

5. Later, having been inundated with media images and explanations describing the 911-related events, I assumed, at least until recently, that they had misinterpreted what they had seen. It is possible, therefore, that I correctly interpreted what they said about their location at the time but later forgot, since this point was not reiterated over and over.

6. It would be impossible, however, for me to forget what this young couple screamed over and over at the top of their lungs about having seen a missile hit the Pentagon. I am absolutely certain about this, although I am uncertain, assuming that they were telling the truth, about where exactly they were when they had this experience.

7. I decided to post what I witnessed, because I felt guilty about withholding this information out of fear of being harassed by whatever institutions might have been involved in orchestrating the attack on the Pentagon if, in fact, the witnesses I heard were telling the truth and had not misinterpreted what they saw. I now feel relieved of that burden and am grateful to 911Truth.org for giving me the opportunity to recount my experience.

Sincerely,
David Edwards discuss at twitter   Share on Facebook   newsvine   digg this!   Stumble It!   reddit   del.icio.us   google   yahoo   icerocket   magnoliacom

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author, who is solely responsible for its content, and do not necessarily reflect those of 911Truth.org. 911Truth.org will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.
home   |   about us   |   contact   |   research   |   store   |   grassroots   |   calendar   |   links   |   search   |   email signup