A ‘Paper Coup,’ and Blackwater Eyes Midtown Manhattan
by Naomi Wolf
November 4, 2007
I have argued that in the closing stages of a `fascist shift’, events cascade.
I am hearing about them, even across the globe. Here in Australia I hear from
the nation’s best-know feminist activist, and former adviser to Paul Keating,
Anne Summers, who was also at the time this took place Chair of the Board of
Greenpeace International. Summers was detained by armed agents for FIVE HOURS
each way in LAX on her way to and from the annual meeting of the board of Greenpeace
International in Mexico, and her green card was taken away from her. `I want
to call a lawyer’, she told TSA agents. `Ma’am, you do not have a right to call
an attorney,’ they replied. `You have not entered the United States.’
Apparently a section of LAX just beyond the security line is asserted to be
`not in the United States’ — though it is squarely inside the airport — so
the laws of the US do not apply. (This assertion, by the way, should alarm any
US citizen who is aware of how the White House argued that Guantánamo is not
`in the United States’ – is a legal no-man’s land — so the laws of the US do
not apply.) Toward the end of her second five-hour detention she asked, `Why
am I being detained?’ `Lady, this is not detention,’ the TSA agent told her.
`Detention is when I take you to the cells out back and lock you up.’
Last week in Boston, while attending Bioneers by the Bay, I heard that one
of the speakers for our event, an environmentalist named Gunter Pauli, was going
to miss the time of his scheduled speech; he had been physically taken OFF THE
PLANE by TSA agents and had to take a much later flight. More chillingly, the
camerawoman doing my interview said that another well-known environmental writer
found that his girlfriend was effectively `disappeared’ for three days as she
sought to enter the US from Canada. Lisa Fithian, an anti-globalization activist,
was denied entry across the Canadian border in 2001 and was offered the choice
of turning back or being arrested.
A friend emails me a story from USA Today about a 24-year-old college graduate
who testified before Congress about her family of immigrants and the difficulties
they face; shortly afterward, the entire family was arrested by immigration
agents. Another online piece reports that Blackwater is setting up operations
along the US/Mexico border and an insightful post on Daily Kos describes how
the TSA list will revert from the airlines to the management of the Department
of Homeland Security shortly and that by February we may well face the need
to apply to the State for permission to travel. If this proposed regulation
goes through, we will move from 1931 to about 1934–when the borders started
to close– with the stroke of a pen. Jews in America have hardwired into their
DNA a sense of the distinction between those who got out before the borders
closed and those who waited a moment too long.
Why should Congress impeach and prosecute this instant, not waiting till February?
Why should this impeachment and prosecution be solidly bipartisan? After February
it is the leaders on both sides of the aisle — and the people writing these
essays — who are at most risk of being turned back at the border. People who
can’t leave in a police state are effectively silenced. And history shows that
Republicans are at the exact same risk as Democrats of being violently silenced
once liberties are lost. I am reading about IBM’s close, profitable involvement
with Nazi Germany — much akin to Prescott Bush’s well-documented close and
profitable involvement with Nazi Germany through German industrialist, Fritz
Thyssen. Right up to the top of the solidly Nazi hierarchy of the IBM affiliate,
corporate executives were terrified of taking a wrong step in the eyes of the
Party: `There are concentration camps’, they would whisper to their US backers.
The teenage son of one solid Nazi ally was taken hostage when he resisted Party
orders. So alignment with the regime in a police state offers no ultimate protection.
Let us think like business consultants analyzing the decisions of a business
that claims it is going to close its door in just a year. What kinds of decisions
is it making? Here is a quiz, if you still doubt that we need to shift our thinking
and recognize what appears to be ‘a paper coup.’:
- Is building a US Embassy in Baghdad the size of eighty football fields and
at a cost of well more than half a BILLION dollars evidence of short- or long-term
- These walls would crumble if the next legitimate president independently
ends the war. How about defending and expanding the basis for FISA violations
at this late stage — after all, these folks will be gone in a year?
- How about the decision to fight so hard for a US attorney who will defend
the view that the President is above the law?
- Why would that matter so much in an administration folding its tents?
- Why the rush to establish Guantánamo as a permanent part of the landscape
and even seek money at one point to double its size — if the next President,
a truly independent Republican or Democrat, might just close it down?
- Why the push to expand a war that makes no military or popular sense, rush
through military tribunals that the next President might just disband, and,
by the way, drum up a fresh new World War III?
- Do the neo-cons advising Giuliani look like a fresh page for an independent,
transparent election or an ideological continuity of government in themselves?
- Do these look like the short-term tactics of a fading administration — or
the institutional strategic bases for some kind of new long-term beginning?
- Why work so hard to make sure that the man who defended the infamous "enemy
combatant" concept will be the new Attorney General?
Increasingly, reputable figures are starting to talk about `a coup.’ Jim Hightower
notes in an important essay, "Is a Presidential Coup Under Way?,"
that a coup is defined in the dictionary as a sudden forced change in the form
of government. (He also spells out the basis for a rigorously modeled impeachment
and criminal prosecution.) Daniel Ellsberg’s much-emailed speech on recent events
notes that, in his view, a `coup’ has already taken place. Ron Rosenbaum speculates
in an essay on Slate about the reasons the Bush administration is withholding
even from members of Congress its plans for Continuity of Government in an emergency
— noting that those worrying about a coup are no longer so marginal. Frank
Rich notes the parallels between ourselves and the Good Germans. And Congress
belatedly realizes as if waking from a drugged sleep that it might not be okay
for the Attorney General to say the President need not obey the law. Congress
may realize why Mukasey CAN’T say that `waterboarding is torture’ — the minute
he does so he has laid the grounds for Bush, Cheney and any number of CIA and
Blackwater interrogators to be tried and convicted for war crimes. They are
so keenly aware that what they have been doing is criminal that laws such as
the Military Commissions Act of 2006 have been drafted specifically to protect
them and the torturers and murderers they have directed from criminal prosecution.
That is why insisting that Mukasey say that waterboarding is torture is, in
spite of the alarming apparent defection of Feinstein and Schumer, an important
tactic and even the perfect opening for the impeachment bid that Kucinich is
bringing on November 6th to be followed by Congressional investigations into
This is the "Blackwater Tactical Weekly." (Yes, Blackwater has its
own weekly e-newsletter.) Look at "Islamist protest in N.Y. – ‘Mushroom
cloud on way’" — it is reasonable to speculate that Blackwater is focusing
on becoming more active domestically in managing domestic protests and rallies.
(Regarding this particular rally, note the repetition of the White House `Mushroom
Cloud’ sound-bite and other signs bearing current White House talking points,
that are attributed to alleged Muslim protesters in New York City. The US has
a long history of using agents provocateurs — people dressed as those they
are targeting, who pose as conveying a more violent or threatening message than
that of the real group itself or who commit acts of violence to stigmatize the
group. The Cointelpro program of the 1970′s discredited many rallies in this
way. An alleged or infiltrated violent, threatening Muslim rally would be the
perfect defensible trigger for a Blackwater response.)
See also that Blackwater may be exploring the management of private flights
in US airports because of a threat or `threat’ to private aircraft. ("Extremists
may target private US planes: TSA.") This entry point to the air travel
system would seem defensible — after all Blackwater personnel do in fact guard
airports around the world, for example in Bosnia. The danger is that a bleeding
of Blackwater into US airport security in general would affect a coup in essence
— quite quickly and serenely — even as a coup in fact need not be declared.
It is a short step from managing private plane and private airport security
to aiding the TSA — which is a branch of Homeland Security — and Homeland
Security and Blackwater have already worked in alliance with one another in
New Orleans. A TSA agent blogged about having signed up for Blackwater — at
ten thousand a month, which is a lot more than TSA agents make now and a real
incentive — but I have no evidence of reverse movement. The White House recently
announced that the Watch List and No-Fly List together have 775,000 citizens
and that they are adding 20,000 A MONTH. This trend on both sides, if not confronted,
points to an easy slide to a paramilitarized domestic flight experience in the
US and a routine aggressive searching of hundreds of thousands of citizens,
the growth being exponential enough so that being aggressively searched could
easily soon become a common experience at airports. Nothing at present prevents
Blackwater agents from being deployed to help or replace the TSA domestically.
Or from being deployed at the next New York City rally such as the one that
is being featured on their website. And airports being the lifeline of freedom,
if you are scared to fly or can be bullied, interrogated, tasered or worse when
flying, you are no longer free. History shows that there is no easy retroactive
movement toward a free society once travel is truly restricted.
The Mukasey hesitation on torture is our cue to call a halt to these crimes.
(By the way, strapping victims to boards to prepare them for torture was common
Congress must ask:
- What is torture?
– Has it happened?
– Who ordered it?
– How high up the chain of command does this go?
– And what does our system of laws say about such crimes and those who commit
If it takes hearings and possible prosecutions to restore the rule of law and
maintain a free society, then it is past time for the hearings to begin.
Source URL: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/a-paper-coup-and-black_b_71067.html